

Good introduction
an excellent and comprehensive source

WildwoodThe premise is that something is very wrong in Wildwood, of the Great Smokey Mountains. A legacy left over from 1916, when sorcery went horribly amok at a lavish chateau, has caused strange creatures to inhabit the woods, and has cloaked the mountain called Tormentil with a sinister aura. Enter Whit and his son Terry; Whit visits the woods to find an old army buddy who may have gone insane (local gossip)--but the old buddy's obssession with halfhuman beasts that he wants to target with his rifle is only the tip of the iceberg. It turns out that Whit has some unfinished business in the woods, which he didn't know he had!
Scenes throughout the book take us back to 1909-16, to shed light on what really happened to let loose what could be demons, to reveal what thrust the chateau into a nether-realm on a night of revelry, and to link the characters of 1958 with those of decades past.
Part William Sloane potboiler (there's an evil genius behind all the science-and-sorcery experimentation), part Harry Potter scenario (austere centaurs and rambunctious faeries in a magic wood, helping out a young boy, Terry, when he's in trouble), the book may also appeal to fans of Robert Holdstock's Mythago Wood.
A few complaints:
About 80 pages into the book, the first of the flashbacks to 1909ish occur, but the first few examples are in diary form. It's already late in the book to suddenly start running a parallel narrative, but that's okay. The strange thing is, all other flashbacks take the form of actual scenes--no diary headings introducing them or anything. This bumpy, unpredictable approach to the 1909-16 sections still strikes me as odd. Perhaps the little diary portions could have been modified to be scenes, or that bitty bit of info in them could have shown up as expository stuff in present-time scenes (ie. someone reminisces, a fragment of a diary is found in 1958, etc.).
Other than that, I guess it might be fair to say that a lot of the 1958 scenes at the start of the book--specifically the ones that establish a quietly sexual relationship between Terry and Cherokee beauty Faren--seem to become meaningless when everything starts to converge at the chateau, in both 1958 and 1916. Terry meets butterfly lady Josie, and hasn't got another thought for Faren. Meanwhile, Arn starts out as a harsh, unfriendly lout (this is Whit's old army pal), but by the end he almost acts like a different person. As he walks off into the sunset, I'm not sure I can forgive him for his earlier transgressions (and I'm not sure I'd let him adopt a baby!). As for the villains, neither the evil sorcerer nor the demonic serpent quite ascend to the level of memorable evildoers; they simply get crowded off the stage for most of the book, and then we're out of pages and it's time for the finale.
But, the book does pull everything together towards the home-stretch. As a time-travel buff, I liked it when the two eras intersected...past and present characters intermixing, even meeting themselves. The last hundred pages are very intense, very revealing (thank goodness), and quite satisfying.
Brilliant and magical.
A great mix of fantasy and truly scary horror.In _Wildwood_, he offers a truly involving mixture of fantasy (at times, this reminded me strongly of Robert Holdstock's _Mythago Wood_) and frightening, cosmic horror. In a relatively short time, Mr. Farris has become one of my favorite authors and I haven't been disappointed yet in any of the books I've read by him, many of which have involved some rather lengthy searching through the musty, dim stacks of used bookstores. Highly recommended!


Don't bother- unrealistic, unpoetic & generally uncompellingBut, setting aside the lack of historical credibility, the book never evokes the feelings of the war or its human impact in a way that Charles Frazier did (I only bring up the comparision b/c of the quote on the paper edition). Bill, our main man here, never develops as a character- he just sort of lurches from phase to phase.
I wouldn't bother with this book- there are so many other novels of the Civil War worth your time.
THE WILDWOOD BOYS
A Master Storyteller

Good but could be better

A VERY ENJOYABLE READ! - BOOK #1Jessamyn Whittaker, at 26, has inherited a newspaper, The Wildwood Times in 1868, from her father, Thad Whittaker and moved herself, lock, stock and barrel from Boston to Wildwood Valley, Oregon.
She is a very determined lady and wants to know just what the Sheriff, Ben Kearney is doing to find her father's killer. She is overwhelmed to find out that her father had purchased a house from the widow, Mrs. Cora Boult - who becomes one of Jess's close friends.
Jess is determined to go with Ben when he leaves town to go talk to the Indian chief Black Eagle. In getting clothes to ride in at the mercantile Jess meets Ella Kearney and her little daughter Alice, who is 5 or 6 years of age [this is pertinent only to time frame]. Ella is married, most happily, to Carleton Kearney, Ben's brother.
Ben Kearney, at 36, is afraid to love and Jess wants only to be a newspaper woman but their trying ride up into the mountains to Black Eagle's holdings starts their bonding and mutual admiration for each other. Jess also meets Black Eagle's adopted daughter, Walks Dancing and they become friends. Jess soon learns that Ben's friend and compadre, Jeremiah Hull is enamored of Walks Dancing.
So there is a wedding July 24, 1868 and a birth March 14 1869 and a picture received in 1874 of 3 little girls - Serena, Jessie and Mary Irene - the tallest looked to be about 6 years old - the picture contained only one word "Troublous" [grin]!
Definitely recommended as an addition to your library - you shouldn't be disappointed. [dates are only of interest if you are interested in trying to reconcile them with book #2 Lost Acres Bride]!


ELOQUENT AND HUMOROUS NATURE WRITING

dense text all the way
One little problem...

Not enough info
Aromatherapy Made Easy

not badStill, this book does something that no other "current" perfume book does: it addresses the chemical compounds present in essential oils and comes close to driving home the point that these are active ingredients one is playing with.
My basic complaint is that it tries to be too much. I'm not an aromatherapist, and have no plans of branching into that, so I don't need to hear about that when I'm blending for purely aesthetic reasons. Nor do I need to read about ayurveda necessarily.
I recommend this book over the Aftel book, and indeed, can see where sections of that book found their inspiration in this volume. My hope is that Ms. Wildwood rewrites this and updates it with her current interests in mind, such as ethical harvesting of essential oils and sustainable agriculture of fragrant plants.
